Fantastic artist, Jeremy Lipking, posted this on his Facebook profile today. It’s a sort of video essay that aired on the BBC by philosopher Roger Scruton. It was immediately re-posted by a slew of excellent figurative painters…so It peaked my interest. The first 2 segments, which i’ll embed here, really struck a chord with me (but if you have some time, check ‘em all out). I’ve had numerous conversations with friends over the last few years on the artistic merit of a certain exhibition or artist…which always leads to what makes art art in the first place. (these usually take place staring at a ball of string or a pile of drift wood on display in packed gallery). Mr. Scrunton has some interesting things to say about conceptual art, and art whose purpose seems the antithesis of beauty. he’s a bit smug (which I love), but I do generally agree with him. (not sure if I agree that modern architecture is the greatest crime against beauty so much, but I see his point).
anyway, enjoy. it’s very inspiring.




2 Responses to WHY BEAUTY MATTERS
Pingback: Metatrash
I don’t agree that we’re losing beauty nor the premise that beauty is the goal of art. I think the goal of art is to make people look, feel, and think. Sometimes it’s beautiful and sometimes it’s ugly. The contrast is important. If anything, showing people ugly art will strengthen the effect of beautiful art.